Feed on
Posts
Comments

I just opened this email today… this is really really really great news.

A coalition of Islamic and research groups today [June 12] announced the launch of a nationwide census project, the first comprehensive survey of its kind, intended to collect accurate data about America’s mosques.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) will conduct the study over the summer and fall, publishing the findings in a report to be released in early 2009.

The census is co-sponsored by a coalition of organizations including CAIR, ISNA, the Muslim American Society (MAS) Freedom Foundation, the Imam Mahdi Association of Marjaeya (IMAM), the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), the Muslim Alliance in North America (MANA), the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), the Hartford Institute of Religion Research (Hartford Seminary), and the Religious Congregations and Membership Study 2010 (a project of the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies).

The goal of the census is to contact every mosque and Islamic center in the United States to compile accurate information about the Muslim community in America, specifically relating to size, infrastructure development, the participation of women and youth, and depth of involvement in American society.

For the full press release from CAIR, see here.

For other links on Islam in America, see my extensive and growing list here.

My friend died this week

One of my friends died this week.

I knew her at the LBJ School and as her TA in a math course. I spent many hours with her through the Spring of this year. She was young – likely late 20s. Cornell University alum. Future policy wonk. A seizure ended her life on earth. I just found out today. I penned a poem today in reflection of her life and death.

She…

She was created.
Created with purpose.
Created with love.

She lived.
Lived as she was taught.
Lived without hope.

She loved.
Loved what she knew.
Loved not the truth.

She tried.
Tried her best.
Tried for nothing.

She rebelled.
Rebelled from her God.
Rebelled… oh the pity!

She wasted.
Wasted her life.
Wasted forever.

She is suffering.
Suffering without limit.
Suffering unimaginable.

She is lost.
Lost in purpose.
Lost
forever.

Thoughts from the Perspectives conference (see pt. 1 here):

As I said in part 1, I’m really excited about the future of the Perspectives course. Not only have they expanded where the course is offered internationally, but they also have very strong, capable leadership in the Fayetteville (yes… Arkansas!) office running the show. David Flynn (national director of Perspectives) and Dr. Steve Shadrach (director of mobilization for the US Center for World Mission and one of the most effective missional catalysts that I know of) seem to have a tight handle on the challenges and opportunities ahead for the course. Also, the global Perspectives team has some stellar leaders also (Steve Hawthorne, Yvonne Huneycutt, Bruce Koch, and so on!)

I am always excited about anything that the U.S. Center for World Mission is up to. Really. With the likes of Dr. Ralph Winter, Greg Parsons, and the rest, they have consistently been one of the most forward looking, bold, faith filled, out of the box missional organizations in the world. Dr. Ralph Winter Last summer, I read the story of the founding of the U.S. Center, Once More Around Jericho; The Story of the U.S. Center for World Mission, by Roberta Winter…. what an awesome story of great vision and faith!! Personally, I believe that in hundreds of years, Dr. Winter will be one of the very few evangelicals that will be remembered. I was tremendously happy to be able to sit under his teaching at the conference!

One new thing at the US Center is a focusing on college students (thanks to Dr. Steve Shadrach: founder of Stumo, the Traveling Team, author of The Fuel and the Flame, founder of The Bodybuilders, etc.). The Center has actually taken on college mobilizers on its staff. My wife and I spent quality time with the Iowa college mobilizers and were humbled by their passion, intelligence, amiability, and their love for Muslims! It will be really exciting to see more and more college students not only mobilized to the nations, but also linked at least indirectly with the work of the U.S. Center.

I just returned this evening from the first annual Perspectives on the World Christian Movement National Conference. In sum, I thought the conference was excellent. More on that later… I’ll be posting a summary/thoughts blog post later this week.

For now, suffice it to say that I am *really* excited about the future of the Perspectives course. We heard about how the course is taking off all over the world. We heard updates such as the following: 7000+ people have taken the course in Korea and Mission Korea has a goal of putting 40,000 people through Perspectives in 20 years. There are 3800 alumni in Australia, 200 in India, as well as classes going on in places like the UAE, Nigeria, New Zealand, and Britain!

We also heard that the new edition of the Perspectives book will be coming out for the Spring 2009 season of courses. I’m excited that the new edition has new sections on topics such as business as mission as well as the post-9/11 global context.

More on the conference in the coming days….

“A controversial debate by the Church of England’s General Synod over whether it should seek to convert Muslims has been postponed to 2009″ (Christian Today<).

Some church leaders feel like they need to make the case for seeking the conversion of Muslims, or else Europe and the UK will become a Eurabia and Londonstan. Paul Eddy, a non-clergy member of the Synod as well as 124 other Synod members voted for the motion. According to Christian Today, Mr. Eddy’s motion called on the House of Bishops to “to confirm their understanding of the uniqueness of Christ in a multi-faith society, and to publish details of best practice in evangelising people of other faiths”.

Of course, others disagreed. Stephen Lowe, Bishop of Urban Life and Faith said, “Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs are learning to respect one another’s paths to God and to live in harmony. This demand for the evangelisation of people of other faiths contributes nothing to our communities.”

Mr. Eddy’s statement shocks me: “Ten days before Lambeth there would be lots of bishops who would not be comfortable voting on the uniqueness of Christ”. What is there to argue about? Are we really still arguing over the question of the uniqueness of Christ and the exclusivity of salvation in Him.

The motivation for this motion, as far as I can tell, was out of fear of impending Londonstan, or Eurabia. Note: I wish they would just read Acts 17:1-26-27 and believe it! Here is a case once again of fear motivating evangelism.

This is, at least ostensibly, a case of interfaith concern taking priority over Scriptural adherence. I’m sorry, I just can’t argue taway the evident mission of God in Scripture to call people to Himself - even from Islam! Stephen Lowe’s statement on this is so incredibly unbelievable (ungodly and unBiblical): “Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs are learning to respect one another’s paths to God and to live in harmony. This demand for the evangelisation of people of other faiths contributes nothing to our communities.”

Ironically, instead of tackling this motion in 2009, the Church will address the use of church buildings as tourist attractions, an important issue in Europe of course. But (I can’t help it) it is horribly saddening that church buildings take precedent over God’s mission as revealed in Scripture.

One last note on a related topic: even though I think that Dr. Williams was unwise in his content and tact regarding his Sharia comments, I do applaud the man for pushing to keep Muslim-Christian relations on the agenda. I didn’t know until today about this meeting of 40 Christian groups from around the world to discuss how to “strengthen ties with Muslims”.

The Sum of All Heresies- Frederick QuinnI am currently reading and writing on Frederick Quinn’s new book The sum of all heresies: the image of Islam in Western thought. (2008. Oxford: Oxford University Press).

I’ll be posting on each chapter as I work through it. Here’s a few comments after reading the Introduction and half of the first chapter:

    • The main topic: “The image of Islam as it developed in the West from the age of Muhammad until now” (5).

    •The ultimate purpose of the book is to aid Christian-Muslim relations: “the purpose of this work is to help find grounds for an ongoing conversation among members of different faiths, by showing the historical roots of such misperceptions and the origins of such religious and cultural mistrust and hartred” (6)

    •In the introduction, he tells his own story about how he was indirectly exposed to Islam: as a child to the images of the Crusaders, as a Foreign Service officer in several different Muslim majority countries and at his post at UCLA. His main point is that Islam – or Islamic leaders, movements, etc. - was not a subject of direct attention. While one would be tempted to think that the popular image today in the West of Islam is mostly negative, Quinn finds reason for hope not only today but through the various voices throughout history who have been balanced in their treatment of Islam (from the Holy Roman Emporer Frederick II (33ff.) to Voltaire, to Louis Massignon, Duncan Black Macdonald, and Kenneth Craig) (15).

When I first heard about this book, I was fairly excited about it. I was interested in what it might add to the literature. Honestly, so far I find the book boorish and ambiguous as to its originality. I am still unclear as to what it adds to the existing literature, such as the classic work of Richard Southern, or the work of Norman Daniel, John Tolan, or even Maxime Rodinson. It would have been better for him to begin this work describing the state of the literature and making abundantly clear why someone should read his work in place of those referenced above.

Is this another case of Christian clergy writing a well developed research paper on Islam rather than an original contribution or at the very least a refreshing nuanced argument?

We’ll see if the book gets better….

I am a co-pastor of a house church in my city who has come together to glorify God through initiating church planting among Muslims in our city and across the nations. We seek to model intentional prayer, evangelism and Biblical community that can be reproduced by Muslim background believers in Jesus Christ here in the U.S., among their people and among the unreached peoples of the earth.

This past weekend we had a house church retreat where we re-evaluated our vision and strategy. On the opening night, I led our church through a study of Acts 18:1-11.

This is really a fascinating passage. I thoroughly enjoyed this study.

Here’s an outline of the study; the fuller study can be found here:

Paul went to Corinth

    Examination: We see here Paul obeying the command of the Great Commission to “Go” (v. 1).
    Application: We have been called by called to leave comfort, to leave our families for the sake of His mission.


Doctrine Missiologically Applied

    Examination: Paul’s “finding” Aquila (from Pontus, then Rome, now in Corinth) and Priscilla was Acts 17:26-27 applied.
    Application: Paul built his missiology on his theology and he applied his theology missiologically. This is how our church should be: always applying our theology and always basing our missiology on our theology.

Reaching not just one family but an entire city

    Examination: Paul’s “custom” (Acts 17:2) of entering the synagogue was intentional: it was there that he could preach to the entire community of Jews. He also preached in the “marketplace” (Acts 17:17) as well as political/judicial centers (Acts 17:22). He aimed for gospel saturation in the public sector (at the Areopagus), the private sector (marketplace), and the religious sector (synagogue).
    Application: Paul’s task was to reach the city, not just one family. Paul knew the value of filtering a city for where God was working. Our task should be the same: reach the entire community of Muslims in our city. If there are 15,000 Muslims in our city, how are we going to see that all of them have a chance to respond to the Gospel?

The Missional Team

    Examination: In this passage alone we see Paul relying on current team members (Silas and Timothy, v. 5) as well as building new team members (Aquila and Priscilla, Titius Justus).

    Application: Paul understood that the advance of the Kingdom requires the hearts, hands, heads, and homes of all kinds of people working in communication with each other. We must not forsake missional community, not only because its Biblical, but also because its needed for our own health and vitality.

Paul Preached Jesus

    Examination: Paul main message was a call to Jesus. His main text was the Scripture. (cf. Acts 17:2-3; 20:21, 24; 23:11; 28:23, 1 Cor. 2:2).

    Application: Paul understood that nothing advances the Kingdom in cities except the proclamation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. It might be a “foolish” message to some, but it is effective for calling out God’s people from the city into His church. We must be intent with our Muslim friends to focus on talking about Jesus with them. Friendships don’t save people. Lifting up Jesus to the place He deserves does (John 12:32).

Rejection

    Examination: V. 6: Paul’s first strategy in Corinth was blocked by “opposition and reviling”. We see the same thing happen at Antioch of Pisidia (Acts 13:46).

    Application: Most missional strategies are blocked or “fail” at least once by opposition or mere circumstances. We have always got to ready to shift strategy to where we see God moving and to what is practically working.

Unintentional Fruit

    Examination: Paul’s first strategy failed, at least by our standards. Interestingly, Paul shifts residence at this point from a Jewish household (Aquila and Priscilla) to a Gentile household (Titius Justus). Let us note Paul’s missiological purpose here – incarnation and respect gathering. Thus, Paul sets his ministry towards the Gentiles in Corinth. At that moment though, something happens that Paul does not intend – the salvation of the household of Crispus Justus, the “ruler of the synagogue”!

    Application: God may move in ways that we do not intend – in fact, in ways opposite of what we intend! Obedience to God, even when it doesn’t make perfect sense to us, is the most fruitful endeavor.

God’s People

    Examination: Here God is keeping His promise given in the Great Commission: “I am with you always” (Mt. 28:20). Jesus provides insight for us: “And I have other sheep that are not of this fold. I must bring them also, and they will listen to my voice. So there will be one flock, one shepherd.” (compare Acts 13:48). In other words, God the Father has given the Son sheep in the city of Corinth and when He calls them, they WILL hear and they WILL become part of the flock of God.

    Application: I believe whole-heartedly that God the Father has people in this city who are now Muslims (“not of this fold”) who He has given to the Son. And I believe that one day the Son will call them out and they will hear his voice and they will follow Him! Do you believe that?!

My beautiful wife finished Christine Mallouhi’s well known book, Miniskirts, Muslims, And Mothers. I asked her to write a review for the blog. She joyfully complied. I married so well….

Summary

This book gives a good picture of the honor and shame that encompasses Muslim cultures. For example, Muslim women might dress up because that’s honorable (wearing jewelry is especially noticed). Women who don’t dress up are often seen to not care about honor or their appearance. They are sometimes seen as sloppy and carefree. They also don’t care about their husband’s image, which is reflected in everything the woman does. Also, many Muslims will get a masters or PhD just because that gains them more honor. This book teaches that Muslims don’t put holy books on the floor or in chairs because they need to hold a physical place of honor. In addition, the furniture in the sitting room where Muslims would accept guests is much nicer than in any other room in the house because guests are to be treated with honor. Also, furniture is arranged so that the most important piece of furniture is situated in an ideal place in the room. The author also talks a great deal about reciprocating hospitality as a source of honor.

Throughout the book, the author warns of several cultural taboos, especially relevant in Arab cultures; for example, a man should never ask about another man’s wife by name. Also, a woman’s appearance or grooming should never be talked about in mixed company. She also lists several stories or tips to deal with gender boundaries. “People will be operating on an understanding of what is right and wrong that is probably not evident to outsiders at first” (158 ) The author says that the person in front of you must take priority over everything; that is, if a friend drops by or calls you on the phone, you must cancel everything to meet with them. If you don’t you are showing them dishonor. If you excessively admire something, the owner should give it to you.

Another chapter is devoted to the veil in Islam. It gives a good picture of western views and different Muslim views of wearing the veil. The author also discusses when it’s appropriate for foreign women to wear a veil.

Another chapter focuses on stereotypes of Western wild women, and how we should react to such stereotypes.

The author also addresses how to share the Gospel, and how to be an example of how to follow Christ. She explains this also in a chapter about family. Muslims come from a very communal society rather than an individualistic society. This should be remembered when sharing the Gospel. She also has a wonderful section written for mothers that shares how moms can really have an impact in the Muslim world. Additionally, for Muslims, the focus of theology is honor whereas with Christians the focus is love. MBB churches must be centered on hospitality and family.

She also talks specifically about struggles that long-term workers may have in the Muslim world.

A whole chapter is devoted to hospitality and what this has to do with honor and shame. Some of the stories about hospitality in Eastern cultures reveals truths about bible stories such as Lot.

The author also explains how it is difficult for classes to mix. She explains that she leaves social change to MBBs who sense that this is wrong and desire to create a change in society. She also discusses how Jesus addresses social classes as a model for us to follow.

Critiques

This book is very focused on Arabs. She lists all the places she has been around the world, but her husband is an Arab and most of the stories seem to have an Arab influence. (Don’t be fooled by the picture of the Southeast Asian women on the front cover).

There are a few quotes with which I disagree:

“It may be rare to see women shopping on their own” (115). I think this totally depends on the country in which you are visiting. In countries like Lebanon and in some places in Turkey, women walk freely along the streets. This comment is probably related to the more strict Islamic societies.

“Westerners who live with Arab families all complain about the lack of privacy” (136). I disagree. We lived with an Arab family in Lebanon and were fine. However, they were Christians, so perhaps this makes a difference.

She says on page 137 that Muslims relate last to their political party; however, I think this also depends on the part of the Muslim world that you visit. In Lebanon, this is a very important part of society.

Who should read this?

The author answers this question within the text: “Christians who want to be friends with Muslims” (169-170).

Check out the Gallup’s three part series on “views on moral issues compare among citizens in key Western and Muslims living in three European capitals. Part one looks at the differences among Western citizens and Muslims. Part two focuses on common ground for Americans (especially those for whom religion plays an important role in their lives) and Muslims. Part three focuses on common ground for residents in three European countries and Muslims living in their capitals.”

Last week I read Bob Robert’s new book, The Multiplying Church; the New Math for Starting New Churches. Here are a few thoughts from my reading:

-The best thing about this book is the best thing about Bob Roberts: energy and optimism. Bob is one of the most optimistic, energetic local church pastors in the country. His optimism is Texas-sized. And it is infectious. The book is worth reading just for the sake of exposure to such (ostensibly) biblical excitement for the mission of God.

-The most unfortunate thing about the book is related to its greatest value: while I suspect Bob would disagree, sometimes it feels that Bob’s excitement about church planting and glocal mission is based on a personal passion to do something great in this world. Is that bad in itself? I don’t know. All I know is that the book would benefit from Bob making clear his greater excitement about making Christ great - rather than just doing something great. References to the Oval Office, to diplomacy in Vietnam, to numerous church starts, etc., are unimpressive to me and I suspect to God. I know Bob knows this, but it is important to state overly clearly: greatness is obedience.

-Roberts really blesses the local church by providing one model of how an institutional church can be a part of God’s global mission. Northwood shows that a local church can really be a church planting church. GBC during the tenure of my father also demonstrated the same.

-At the same time, a potential weakness of the book is that most of the in depth illustrations are from Northwood and/or Bob Robert’s life and leadership. Obviously, we have much to learn from Roberts and Northwood! But there is much to learn elsewhere too. It is just important for the reader to discern that Bob is giving one way of doing things; an assertion I believe that he would support (for instance, see p. 50).

-I LOVE Bob’s emphasis on “Jesus movements” above “church planting movements” as well as his restatement of “church planting” as “gospel planting”. I also love his call for church plants and house churches to be started not out of a rejection of something (i.e., the established church), but rather in pursuit of something (i.e., a new Jesus movement!) (see p. 31). Incidentally, the house church I am a part of was started in this way: in pursuit of a CPM among Muslims. This has made all the difference in our relationship with the established church and has been so healthy for us!

- I also appreciate his rethinking of institutions as the potential preservers of the stories of movements and the values therein (p. 35, 61).

-I love his listing of people who will “for sure” not be a part of CPM: as a sample, “frustrated denominational or organizational executives….superstar senior pastors….self-serving model gurus….” See p. 50 for the rest.

-When I read about Robert’s church growth strategy I feel like I am listening to my dad: to grow a local church, get that church to start churches and to release its people to God’s missional movement! Church planting is not something that long established “healthy” churches to after growing; rather, its what young churches do! Church planting is a great church growth strategy!

Quotes of the Day

“Where do you start in your dreaming — the church or the world outside the church? That determines everything” (Roberts, Bob. 2008. The multiplying church: the new math for starting new churches. Grand Rapids, Mich: Zondervan. 72).

“Local churches with the the mandate of the Great Commission have instead become the epitome of religious institutional consumerism” (Ibid., 125).

“I believe that the final Jesus movement (if it happens in the next two hundred years) will be seeded by the Muslims who will then take the gospel to the ends of the earth”
(Ibid., 133).

“The Great Commission will one day become the Great Completion” (Ibid., 133, though referenced to Dick Bashta)

Sorry for the slow posting lately. I’ve been busy working (yes, I have a day job) and working through 2 new books this week (2 very different books!): The Certainty Trap by Bill Musk and The Multiplying Church, by Bob Roberts.

More to come on each later.

One of the most perplexing issues for both Muslims and Christians is that of the triumph of the infidels. Christians dealt with this question during the early years of Islamic conquest. In response, the swift domination of Islam in North African and in Spain, Christian theologians were not able to bring resolution to the attacks upon their theologically framed historiography, namely, their belief that historical destiny would prove them triumphant. Therefore, they either settled with ignorance of Islam or they purposefully maligned Islam and Muhammad in order to justify their historiography, to rationalize history with their theology, and to protect their flock from conversion to Islam. In his work, Saracens , John Tolan puts it this way:

All these authors struggled with the same troubling questions: why should God allow the Muslims to conquer (and maintain) huge territories and to reduce their Christian inhabitants to the status of dhimmi? Was it because God preferred Islam? … That could not, of course, be the response of the authors who chose to remain Christian; they needed other explanations. In other words, they had to adapt to the concepts of Christian theology and Christian historiography to explain Islam to their Christian readers. In so doing, they had to convince their readers of the superiority of Christianity, of the need to remain steadfast in the ancestral faith. (41).

Muslim academic elites have struggled with this issue in the modern era – during European colonial expansion. The perplexing question at hand is, in short: “If Islam is the true religion, how is it that the infidel religion is more ascendant, in terms of influence, demography, and geographical control, than the true religion? Why is the West dominant and the Muslim world lacking?”

The great scholar Albert Hourani recounts how the 19th century Muslim intellectual Jamal al-Din al-Afghani dealt with this problem:

Al-Afghani resolves the paradox by saying that neither the achievements of Christian nor the failure of Muslim countries are due to their religions. The Christian peoples grew strong because the Church grew up within the walls of the Roman Empire and incorporated its pagan beliefs and virtues; the Muslim peoples grew weak because the truth of Islam was corrupted by successive waves of falsity. Christians are strong because they are not really Christian; Muslims are weak because they are not really Muslim. (1962. Arabic thought in the liberal age, 1798-1939. Issued under the auspices of the Royal Institute of International Affairs. London: Oxford University Press., 129)

For a year now I have been fascinated with this crisis and how both Christians and Muslims have responded to it. I think that this is actually one of the most perplexing theological problems that face both Muslims and Christians today. The Muslim world still sees the infidel West as clearly dominating global affairs. Much of Christendom is deeply afraid of the growing ascendancy of the Muslim world (this fear is most often expressed using the language of demography).

As I see it, there are several issues to be addressed here:

1. Theology: does either the Bible or the Qur’an teach that the elect have a triumphal historical destiny in the age before Judgment?
2. Global Affairs: are we really able to determine which religion (Christianity or Islam) is more ascendant than the other?
3. Given the answers to #1 & #2, are their textual or traditional guidelines for how adherents to each religion should respond?

Your thoughts?

From the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding:

A new report released today by the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding (ISPU) outlines how Muslim community-based health organizations (MCBHOs) are providing a critical safety net in health care access for the most underserved communities in America. The first-of-its-kind study, titled “Caring for Our Neighbors,” provides a deeper understanding of the motivations that drive American-Muslim health providers, the demographic makeup of the populations they serve and the clinics’ growing role in American public health and community building.

See the report here.

My article, “The Effect of the Dollar on the American Missionary Sending ‘Enterprise’” has been published in the May issue of the Lausanne Committee for World Evangelism’s e-zine Lausanne World Pulse.

Older Posts »